![]() ![]() They are of interest as showing the evidence considered and presented in the debates within the Church of England. ![]() Loveday Alexander is more concerned with an appropriate hermeneutic, focusing on the acceptance of the gentiles as an analogy which suggests attending to the present context seriously, and that the ancient world had a vastly different context and assumptions.īoth are in effect relatively brief summaries of positions. He provides a fairly traditional interpretation of the seven key biblical texts (recognising the limited applicability of Genesis 19 and Judges 19), but also refers to Jonathan and David, and the gospels. Ian Paul’s essay is essentially a shorter version of his Grove Booklet. The two essays by Ian Paul and Loveday Alexander deal most directly with the Bible. These essays were provided as resources for the Shared Conversations process within the Church of England. Here is an annotated bibliography on the Bible and homosexuality, sexuality and gender.Ī Reader: Writings to Resource Conversations, Grace and Disagreement: Shared Conversations on Scripture, Mission and Human Sexuality. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |